Sale of

bovine leather

australian online casino license

2+2 ignition pokerRegulation failed on several fronts and the statements and missives of the Gibraltar Gambling Commissioner show not only arrogance in his disdain for online players as well as a proclivity to shield the offending suppliers and v australian online casino licenseenues, but his follow-up statement also shows a profound ignorance of the basic maths of gambling.Following the player messages boards we see that BetFred may have known about the Hi-Lo Gambler issue as long ago as 2008. The hubris and arrogance of GTECH (yes they changed their official name again) as a major corporation, totally out of touch with the gravity of the issue does not bode well for the future of player protection in the online gambling industry.online poker indiaIt is this author’s opinion that GTech should well have known about these games, if not in 2008 then certainly in early 2012 when, we can assume, the Stan James organization contacted them. When switching to real money mode they would be playing an entirely different game. Stop splitting hairs and looking for ghosts in cupboards, and next time, look at little closer at what is being claimed, check the facts, and do your own homework, before doing mine.texas holdem poker deluxe edition

30 no deposit casino

spin casino wikipedia The hubris and arrogance of GTECH (yes they changed their official name again) as a major corporation, totally out of touch with the gravity of the issue does not bode well for the future of player protection in the online gambling industry. One could certainly assume that the Stan James organisation had indeed been in contact with the game supplier, confirmed the games were dysfunctional, and pulled them. The games that were re-engineered by GTech companies were gaffed, the games not re-engineered played as advertised. The HiLo game was created in 2003/4…there was obviously no testing that assured that the games played in accordance with their pay tables with real play and practice modes behaving the same, and that the same game deployed in different venues was indeed ‘the same game’. We say, “may have known” as there is only a copied post from a private forum to back up this claim. The HiLo game was created in 2003/4…there was obviously no testing that assured that the games played in accordance with their pay tables with real play and practice modes behaving the same, and that the same game deployed in different venues was indeed ‘the same game’.dendera casino instant play

golden nugget casino atlantic city

monopoly slots free coins hack 2022It is this author’s opinion that GTech should well have known about these games, if not in 2008 then certainly in early 2012 when, we can assume, the Stan James organization contacted them. You should not support cheats, they are cheating honest operators and honest players; but bugs and errors do occur, and we deal with them. The games that were re-engineered by GTech companies were gaffed, the games not re-engineered played as advertised.white lotus casino.com This is even more disturbing knowing that Mario Galea, chairman of the Malta Lotteries and Gaming Authority; widely regarded as nothing more than a rubber stamping, license fee collecting, player ignoring organisation has been appointed as Online Gaming Adviser for New Jersey casinos. The issues that relate this game directly to Reel Deal and Hi/Lo Gambler in several ways beyond the platform provider that may have altered the games and certainly delivered them through casinos are thus. Post #220 This post would have given him all the information he needed to begin his investigation and carry out his duties rather than “playing the jaded copper” and laying blame at the feet of players.syndicate casino sign up