Sale of

bovine leather

online pokies real money paysafe

true blue casino birthday bonusI have been heavily criticised in the second thread for addressing katie91’s behaviour. Esteemed commentators suggest ‘her’ behaviour is not relevant (and that the error was deliberate). This closed mind-set by people who should know better is very disappointing.blackjack dealer hit on 16 Is there a message there? As for the UKGC’s comments, the full correspondence has never been disclosed, but by any measure of regulators’ behaviour they appear to have acted partially and with undue, ill-considered haste in this matter, quickly and incorrectly treading in other jurisdictions’ affairs, effectively endorsing the findings of a non-authorised, non-approved ‘testing person’ instead of online pokies real money paysaferaising their own queries; so they too are now aligned with the cheating side of this argument. You say this is not relevant?The game was not ‘rigged’, ‘gaffed’ or any other acronym for ‘fixed’, nor was it even ‘advertised’ as having 100% RTP as she and many online pokies real money paysafeof you have claimed. If katie91 had started the thread with,‘Hey I am a bot designer using false online identities and for the last 6 weeks I have been tryin online pokies real money paysafeg to cheat a game, but I have goofed and I now realise there is an error on the paytable, but by the time I worked this out my bot had turned over nearly ￡400k and lost me over ￡12k, will you help me get my money back by saying the company are cheats?’Would she have got the same reaction? Is this accurate description of events not a bit more relevant that the 14 entries ‘she’ made to con you all? We are where we are because ‘she’ lied to you, end to end, and because I have taken the trouble to correct that situation, whereas other weighed in behind her without asking obvious questions.slots of vegas 300 free

live blackjack watch

777 casino no deposit bonus Even Bryan seems to be in that category. The first thread made clear that the game existed on Gibraltar, Alderney and Malta operators’ sites, I understand it also existed on others. This closed mind-set by people who should know better is very disappointing. You say this is not relevant?The game was not ‘rigged’, ‘gaffed’ or any other acronym for ‘fixed’, nor was it even ‘advertised’ as having 100% RTP as she and many online pokies real money paysafeof you have claimed.” It is a hard but undeniable truth, that the only evidence of anyone being misled by the paytable error is katie91. By who’s stretch of who’s imagination is a paytable in the Help File an advertisement? No advertising authority or gambling regulatory authority defines advertising to include the esoteric contents of a Help File, which we all know virtually no-one ever reads.free slot games 4u

poker game unblocked

poker online 3d For page after page, until we intervene, her lies that the game was ‘rigged’ are the basis of what we now say was a disproportionate and unfounded attack on the integrity of the games and the games provider, amplified by people who should have known better.Did no-one else find it a little strange that an organisation that took 6 months to deal with the FOBT case (and provided virtually no information about it) and has zero profile in matters such as these, takes only 3 days to weigh in on this one, providing some considerable but irrelevant detail, promoting its own cause, despite the game meeting published UK standards (except for the error).I have been heavily criticised in the second thread for addressing katie91’s behaviour.cashman free pokies If katie91 had started the thread with,‘Hey I am a bot designer using false online identities and for the last 6 weeks I have been tryin online pokies real money paysafeg to cheat a game, but I have goofed and I now realise there is an error on the paytable, but by the time I worked this out my bot had turned over nearly ￡400k and lost me over ￡12k, will you help me get my money back by saying the company are cheats?’Would she have got the same reaction? Is this accurate description of events not a bit more relevant that the 14 entries ‘she’ made to con you all? We are where we are because ‘she’ lied to you, end to end, and because I have taken the trouble to correct that situation, whereas other weighed in behind her without asking obvious questions.A number of CM users put katie91 and her so called evidence on a pedestal, built their arguments around her claims without checking them out properly, wanting to believe what she had written, and now they find it impossible to admit they were had over by a con-man and got this whole episode wrong.According to her CM log she has made 14 postings, so who is treating who with disdain here, after two weeks and over 200 entries on ‘she’ was still posting and leading you all on as to what had occurred, as well as lying in emails to the operator.4 jacks casino jackpot nevada